Monthly Archive for September, 2009

Three years in

Three years ago, towards the end of August, Alex and I made a life-altering decision six hours into an eight hour drive home from vacation. It was the start of our relationship, and has been one of the defining factors ever since. When we decided to give up dairy, eggs and other non-meat animal bi-products, I didn’t really give it much thought besides how I was going to “get through” that specific day without cheese or eggs. I thought I would be overwhelmed, both by cravings and the sheer amount of food we were no longer willing to eat. I prepared myself for the worst, but I knew I was ready. I jumped with both feet, half expecting to fail but ready to try just the same.

As it turned out, there was very little change in my life. I swapped out the yogurt and milk in my fridge for soy milk and soy yogurt, and discovered Earth Balance butter. We tried a couple new restaurants, but for the most part ate at all our old favorites. I cooked in a little more, tried some new ingredients. When pizza commercials came on TV, I changed the channel. I still craved cheese, especially when eating around omnivores, but I channeled my energy into school and my new relationship. Sometimes I would slip - a handful of chocolate chips here, a cracker with dairy in it there. I remember Alex and I taking a trip to see my grandparents in October for my 21st birthday and taking a “vegan break” which involved several slices of New York pizza and a lot of pancakes. Alex and I reasoned that Peter Singer had the right idea, and that if completely denying ourselves animal products was going to cause us to stop being vegans, then we should give ourselves a little “treat” now and again and imbibe. I gave up cheese and eggs, but I didn’t really give up wanting them. We didn’t want to be “those vegans”; too extreme, too fanatical, too strident. Some compromise, we though, is necessary to make people feel comfortable. We took the Paris Exception again, when Alex moved to DC for the first semester of his Masters program, when I visited a friend in North Carolina, and finally when Alex moved back and we went on vacation with his mom. It was a week long vacation, and we stuffed ourselves silly with “forbidden items”.

That summer, we ordered several animal rights philosophy books off the internet, among them Gary Francione’s Introduction to Animal Rights. We read them, and for the first time since I became a vegetarian at age seven, I had a true change in thinking about animals.

What brings this up is a post I read today at Vegan Feminist Agitator about the internal shift in how we conceptualize animals that seems to set vegans apart from non-vegans, in tandem with my new job - or more accurately, my new co-workers. Most of my co-workers have only recently found out I am vegan, you see, and out of the five who know, four have made the comment that they would be vegan except they “could never give up cheese”. It’s a pretty common excuse comment, I know - I made it myself, dozens of times. Even after I “gave up” cheese, I still clung to this notion that cheese (and milk and eggs and even honey) were somehow things that I had a right to. Even after “sacrificing them” I still felt like, well, I was making a sacrifice by not consuming them. They were still a treat, still an item that I felt I should somehow be able to consume. Which brings me to that summer I had my true Gestalt Shift, the summer that ended my first year of veganism.

A Gestalt Shift is essentially a true shift in intellectual position - a change in thinking so profound that it alters your whole outlook on the world, and changes the way you think. Not just the actions you take, but the way you view things. A perceptual transformation. In some ways, the transformation from omnivore to vegan in requires at least a small Gestalt Shift (after all, you must come to assign some value non-humans that you did not previously allow them), but I think that for some vegans, it isn’t all that big of a change. After all, most humans assign independent value to the non-human animals we keep as pets. It isn’t that difficult to say okay, if my dog deserves not to be killed at eaten, then a pig doesn’t either. Our rational, categorical minds can understand this, and most of us are socialized early on to believe that non-human pet animals deserve love, kindness and at least some consideration. The kind of veganism that results from the extension of this concept is the kind that says we should refrain from harming non-humans, but still allows us to have some rights to them - to their bodies, and the products of their bodies - because they still “belong” to us. This is how I felt about animals when I first went vegan. We (humans) owned them, but it was not right or acceptable to harm them if we could avoid doing so. Perhaps, one day, I would have a cow of my own to milk, and some chickens whose eggs I could eat, but until then I would avoid consuming animal products unless I felt I had to, to protect my veganism. In other words, I still had the rights to their products, as long as they weren’t harmed. And if it was in their best interest, I would consume the products.

This is probably nothing new to most people - that it takes a pretty large shift in thinking to go from it’s-not-okay-to-harm-animals-but-it-is-okay-to-treat-them-like-we-have-rights-to-them to we-have-no-right-to-own-or-use-anything-they-do-are-or-make, but it’s this concept that struck me dumb that summer, two years ago. I had my Gestalt Shift that day, and suddenly it became easy, simple, effortless to live without cheese or eggs or milk. I no longer had the desire to consume them, because suddenly, they weren’t mine to consume anymore than the flesh of a human child would be. I went from “someday, I’ll have cheese again…” to the sudden realization that I never wanted cheese again. It wasn’t that it tasted bad, or smelled bad, or looked bad  - it was just that somewhere in my head, a switch went off that changed my thought process completely. It was sudden, profound and unasked for, and once it was done there was no going back.

That shift changed a lot more than just the way I looked at cheese, and forced me to re-evaluate a lot of other things in my life, but I’ve never been more thankful for anything, ever. Unlike my original transition to veganism, my Gestalt Shift changed a lot in my life. In many ways, it was the shakeup I feared when I first switched diets. I suddenly came to understand why so many vegans acted the way they did (or I perceived they did) towards omnivores and vegetarians, and why they could be so hostile. I started to feel uncomfortable eating with still-omnivorous friends. I started talking to my non-vegan friends about why they should be vegan. It went from being a “personal choice” to something that was so clearly right for everyone that I wondered why I didn’t see it long ago. I struggled with some aspects, but for the most part I finally felt like I was doing the right things. Some things didn’t change - I still didn’t hold with PETA’s activism techniques, for example - and I was glad because it helped me to understand that this wasn’t just a fad or passing set of ideals. Somehow, I had really and truly changed my internal wiring.

Three years in, I wonder why I didn’t see the bright clear line I see now before. Like Alex, like Marla over at Vegan Feminist Agitator, I still don’t always understand why other people aren’t capable of seeing it and switching their own internal switch. I still don’t know how to get people to make that switch, and I don’t always know how to deal with people who haven’t made it, but are otherwise good people. I don’t know quite how to come to terms with most of my own family’s studied, determined ignorance. I don’t always know how to relate to people about my veganism, because I don’t know how to convey the profound change it has caused within me in a way that they can understand. I don’t even always know how to relate to other vegans who don’t share the same viewpoints. What I do know is that Marla is right - I am an ordinary person. I am not unique. I am smart, yes, but many people are smarter. I observe my ethics and try my best to act in accordance with my morals, but so do many others. I once said, “I could never give up cheese” when veganism was mentioned. Somehow, my switch got flipped from a position that said “I could never give up cheese,” and left logic and morality there, to a position that said “Cheese who?”

Tattoo you!

Our apologies for the lack of posting. The past six weeks have been hectic: The Big Move combined with The Great Apartment Hunt and The Depressing Job Hunt have culminated in various degrees of success. We’re moved in, Alex has started in his program and is busy with school, while I am working 40 hours a week for the first time in four years and loathing every minute of it. Granted, those 40 hours are spent on my feet serving people coffee (and, likely as not, various animal products with that coffee), so I feel like I have some right to be exhausted at the end of every day. But I digress.

At the end of the summer before I left Salt Lake for Philadelphia (see: The Big Move), I decided to take the plunge on my first vegan themed tattoo. It was actually my first time getting tattooed since going vegan, and thus doubly important because I had a lot more to think about in terms of who should do it, where to get it done, and how to care for it. Many people are unaware that tattoos can be “un-vegan”, but like pretty much everything else in the world (hello, condoms?!) vegans need to put a little extra thought into the experience.

This piece was designed around a quote from Tom Regan. I’ve always loved script, and I’ve always loved swallow tattoos, so the choice to combine them gave me two things I loved in one. It was a great experience and I’ll certainly be getting some more script at some point because this turned out fabulously beautiful. I love the colors dearly, I love the theme more, and most of all I love that I can add to it! (Eventually I’ll be adding sky and clouds behind the bird and script, and hopefully getting another bird and sky on the other foot).

I debated long and hard about whether or not to get this piece on my foot as opposed to somewhere else. Unlike everything else I have, it isn’t so easy to cover up. The stereotype of vegans as tattoo-havin’ hooligans isn’t my favorite, because a) not all vegans have tattoos by a long shot and b) who says tattoo = hooligan? I find being stereotyped as anything frustrating, and this particular stereotype seems to cause people to categorize one as unintelligent and thus not worth listening to. In the long run I decided that it was still coverable enough.

tattoo1 tattoo2

Some (vegan) things to consider before you get your tattoo:

What do I want?

Making the commitment to my first vegan-themed tattoo was extremely exciting, but I do have two other non-vegan (themed) tattoos that I had first. What you want will really depend on WHO you are and what you love. Tattoo styles run the gamut from flash (traditional) tattoos to extremely realistic portraits, depending on who your artist is and what you’re looking for. One thing any good tattoo aficionado will tell you is make absolutely, positively, 100%, never-gonna-look-back, certain that you get exactly what you want. You have to be ready to commit for life, so make sure you love it. Most of the time it helps to take your artists a reference picture or two and a couple ideas, then talk about what you want. Your artist should be able to draw you a custom piece that incorporates the themes, ideas and styles you specify - within reason. A good artist will do her/his best to accommodate all your wishes, while still being able to tell you what ideas are realistic and what aren’t. For example, my original plan for my tattoo was much, much smaller. CJ and I talked about it and I realized there was no way that I could get everything I wanted in detail and go smaller, so I had to make a choice. Giving your artist some creative leeway usually turns out better results, but if you really want EXACTLY what you’ve shown them, don’t be afraid to say so.

Two things I’ve always loved for vegan-themed tattoos are portraits and script. Portraits allow us to immortalize our non-human friends in all their wonder, and script lets us tell people that we’re vegan and DAMMIT, we’re proud. If you’re interested in getting a portrait of a specific animal, make sure you bring a picture if possible - if you can, bring one taken especially for the occasion with good lighting and any specific pose you want, but if you can’t, pick a picture you love. If you’re interested in a more non-specific portrait, bring in several samples. If you’re getting script, first, find someone who specialized in it if possible. Second, don’t tell them exactly what kind of script to use - it’ll turn out better if you let them take care of it. DO tell them if you want lots of filigree, specific capitalization, or if you want to change anything.

If you don’t know what you want that well, it’s usually best to wait. Inspiration will come - someday - and you’ll be happy you did.

Who is going to do it?

Picking your tattoo artist should be something like picking your life partner. After all, the art they put on your skin is going to be with you for, well, ever. (For those of you thinking you can just get your art removed in 10 years, you should reconsider getting one at all). Each artist has a unique style, and different strengths and weaknesses. The best way to get what you want is to do your research and view as many examples as you can lay your hands on. Do you want a vegan artist? While they do exist, it can be difficult to find one, and it may be better to get something you love by a non-vegan (using vegan ink and products, of course) than something you’re not sure about from a vegan. If you’re lucky enough to live in Portland or NYC, then you have access to all-vegan shops, but otherwise you may have to compromise or be willing to do a lot of asking around. I’ve found vegan artists by simply asking people with statement-making ink where they got theirs done.

Vegan Ink?

Tattoo ink is made of pigment particles suspended in a medium. That means there are two parts that can be non-vegan: the particles and the medium. Ingredients in non-vegan inks can include yummy things like charred bone shards and animal fat, which is one of the reasons I think it’s so important to make sure you do get vegan ink. After all, you don’t want to walk around with little pieces of someone in your skin for the rest of your life.

So how does one procure vegan ink? There are several commercially made and widely used inks on the market - you can start by asking for them by name. They are:

  • Eternal
  • Starbright
  • SkinCandy
  • Classic
  • Stable
  • Intenze
  • Waverly
  • Unique (except black, which is bone-black and contains bone shards)

Many artists also use their own, homemade ink (the artists at the shop where I’ve had all my tattoos done do). If your tattoo artist mixes her/his own ink and doesn’t know if the ingredients are vegan, you can always have them give you a list of what they use and check it for them. Luckily for me, Salt Lake has a large (or at least vocal) vegan population and CJ was able to tell me right off the bat that the ink was safe. Phew!

Sometimes non-vegan initiated artists do get a little annoyed when you ask a thousand questions about their ink. On this go-round, I really wanted to go to an amazing artist who does extremely beautiful and detailed work. Alex’s sister and her boyfriend happened to be going in for their appointments, and offered to ask him if his ink was vegan. After a couple calls back and forth, we finally had him give us a list of inks he used to check against the vegan list, but at this point he had pretty much made up his mind not to take me on as a client. If you’re unsure of your selected artist’s feelings, go armed with information and make the process as painless as possible for her/him.

Anything else?

You bet. First of all, there are a myriad of products used during and after the actual tattooing process at the shop that may or may not be vegan. How far you want to take this is your prerogative: if you are uncomfortable using any non-vegan products, you may want to do you best to secure a vegan artist or go to a totally vegan shop. At the very least, you can ask about items like the razors they use to shave the skin in preparation, the solution used to moisten your skin for the transfer, the solution used during the actual tattooing to keep the needle sliding in and out, and any ointment they use on your skin after the tattoo is finished. The bottom line is that much like most things in the world, it can be very difficult to make certain everything that touches you during this process is totally vegan. Where you draw the line depends on you.

After care!

Find vegan aftercare products can be a odyssey. Most of the ointments recommended by tattoo artists (Aquaphor, A&D etc.) contain lanolin or beeswax by virtue of being non-alcoholic. Boo that. While really any vegan lotion will do, you really want a lotion that doesn’t contain alcohol. You also want a very gentle soap for cleaning. This go-round, I used a combination of Black Cat aftercare products (which RAWK and are not that expensive), Jason Vitamin E lotion, and vegetable based soap from a variety of sources. Products meant specifically for tattoo aftercare are easier to use for the early stages of healing because they tend to adhere and stay put, better protecting the tattoo and keeping it moist longer. Once healing is over, you can go back to your normal vegan lotion, although you should always always make sure to apply lotion to your tattoo once daily and to lather on the sunscreen if it’s going to be exposed to the sun (Merry Hempsters makes a nice lotion/sunscreen combo for tattoos that comes in handy stick form).

Very random question(s)

thinker21If I’m challenged on the various reasons that we all assume justify our exploitation of animals and a logical counter-challenge escapes me, and yet I still refuse to change my behavior, what does that say about me? Can I still consider myself moral, in other words, if despite evidence that I cannot rationally defend causing harm to the billions of animals we exploit annually I refuse to even consider stop causing that harm through my purchase-power?

I am thinking of a specific instance where two people stood in front of me for twenty minutes coming at me with justification after justification for why they aren’t vegan, reasoning that I exposed as deeply problematic, only to have one of them say to me, “I like how logical your arguments are but I am still not convinced that I should stop eating meat.”

This raises two questions: If logic won’t convince you that your actions aren’t defensible, what will?

And: Given that we are talking about suffering and death, isn’t it telling of the ethical nature of the person who admits that his participation in these institutions of mass suffering and death isn’t defensible but he still won’t resist?

This famous statue may be depicting an activity that is quite foreign to members of our species. We don’t reason, we assume and close our eyes. Peter Singer’s argument that given the time and resources, human animals are capable of arriving at ethical conclusions through reasoning, is suspect. Indeed, Singer argues, we actually desire it; it’s in our nature. This assumption dominates animal rights theory today.

I doubt it.

Typical

(Update below)

Here’s a recent comment thread discussing speciesism. (You can find the post and all comments here.) I wanted to show it to everyone because it really displays some typical features of everyday conversations about animal rights. Watch how quickly the opponent strays off topic into insults and belligerence. There isn’t a substantive counter-argument to be found in all those words. My argument seems to be profane; the “truth” is self-evident; how dare I criticize it. Speciesism is like religion, and the opponent is the blindly faithful. We don’t know why we believe these things, but how dare someone raise a challenge.

gooblyblog:
we are the same and not the same…humans are animals but not all animals are humans

seriously, using that logic… trees also need oxygen as do we, does that make us trees?

if humans learn to treat other humans with dignity and respect then it will also extend to other non-human animals, animal rights organisations tend to leap over this very important step and it is hurtful to other people who suffer even more than non-human animals…

PETA is focusing wrongly on animal cruelty. I love animals to death seriously I do but I find PETA’s tactics awful. Me eating an animal is no more or less wrong than a lion or bear eating another animal.

Society has long viewed non-human animals as beneath them and that is why certain groups of humans they want to push down the social ladder get compared to animals. If everyone truly loved and respected animals then they wouldn’t be used as an analogy to demean other humans.

Alex:
The difference between you and the lion is your moral agency goodblyglob. You possess the capacity to reason about ethics, right and wrong. And therefore, unlike some mentally handicapped humans and human infants, you are expected to govern your behavior according to moral standards.

Since veganism is healthy at all stages of the life-cycle, your consumption of animals is a choice; a choice that necessarily involves harm and death. And therefore, on our own principles about the wrongness of causing harm, your decision must be defended ethically.

Furthermore, considering the treatment exposed in PETA’s “Meet Your Meat,” or any other exposé of the sort, it’s difficult to argue that nonhuman animals aren’t suffering in comparable, if not worse, ways than human animals.

gooblyglob:
I’m not gonna try to change the minds of vegetarians and vegans… but the length of my intestines tells me that meat is part of my diet and so I’m going to keep it in my diet. However my bunny rabbit is stuck being a vegan because he doesn’t have the capacity to digest meat. An aside regarding vegetarianism, yes it can work - look at the panda bears - they have the digestive system of an omnivore and yet mostly eat only bamboo, they have to eat huge amounts and spend most of their day eating because their body is unable to convert the energy stored in plants efficiently. I choose to eat meat because I choose to have a balanced diet and not become a panda bear.

it’s difficult to argue that nonhuman animals aren’t suffering in comparable, if not worse, ways than human animals.

The scary thing is… it’s actually not difficult at all. That is why it is such an insult especially to PoC to make the comparison when it comes to semantics of humans being the same as animals. How some people have treated other PoC, they would not treat their own non-human animals even half as badly. To make such a statement erases the experiences suffered by those humans not even granted the respect and affections granted to animals.

Alex:
In the latest report by the American Dietetic Association (ADA), it states that not only does a vegan diet provide all the nutritional content necessary for a “well-balanced” diet, but that it also has health benefits related to cancer, chronic conditions related to cholesterol, etc. Similar findings have been found by the American Cancer Society and other mainstream health professional organizations.

Indeed, evidence suggests that our intestinal tract is too long to efficiently process animal products, which correlates with negative health outcomes. Furthermore, anecdotal evidence abounds regarding the positive health consequences of a vegan diet. One cannot make a rationally sustained argument that veganism doesn’t provide a “well-balanced” diet.

Your entire second point simply begs the question: Why is the suffering experienced by human animals “worse” than that suffered by nonhuman animals. And again, your point is negated by the documented evidence of the suffering we inflict on nonhuman animals as a matter of routine.

gooblyglob:
I don’t believe in vegan propaganda. I did when I was 10 but not anymore.

JillianBee:
Biological capability and biological necessity are not always linked concepts. While our bodies may have evolved to continue to allow us to eat animal products, that does not mean that it is necessary to do so for our diets to be balanced and healthful.

I do agree with you that some people treat some PoC badly but their own pets kindly, but “respect and affections” are rarely universally granted to animals. While, people may treat their pets kindly, they frequently do this while killing, torturing, maiming and eating other animals (or having an agent do this on their behalf). All this is really indicative of is that human beings are perfectly capable as dividing animals into the same categories as people — worthy and unworthy of consideration — as most benefits their needs and wants.

gooblyglob:
Sorry… if this is an argument for vegetarianism or veganism, consider me a permanent lost cause. I am completely against CRUELTY to animals but I will never be against the EATING of animals. I believe that life can be good and death can be quick and painless. My fight is to ensure this, not to stop people from eating meat. Besides, meat is expensive… I rarely eat it anyway… but I’m not going to criticise others for doing so.

Alex:
You see this is a good example of speciesism gooblyglob. Could we reason similarly about human animals? “I believe that life can be good and death can be quick and painless,” and therefore we ought to reconsider our views regarding human slavery, for example, given the potential benefits of human biomedical experimentation.

This argument is only contradictory to your own reasoning if you assume that for some reason members of our species are excluded from your own conclusions. That is straight-forward prejudice gooblyglob, and is as ethically indefensible as it was (and is) when used to justify causing harm to PoC or women for the sake of some other biological group.

gooblyglob:
what the fuck are you on about? experimentation on living beings are almost never good, nor quick or painless and to even suggest so is morally disgusting.

members of our species are excluded from your own conclusions
can you at least clarify who I’m excluding???

Alex:
Please read carefully. (A) Your proposition was that you are against “cruelty” to nonhuman animals but killing is acceptable because (B) “life can be good and death quick and painless.” (C) This argument only makes sense if you assume that taking life is justified; it’s justified so long as you have given the being a “good” life.

So I applied your own reasoning to members of our species. One could be sedated during the vivisection, for example, and then painlessly killed. According to your own argument, this is acceptable if we first provided the victim with a “good” life.

Accept this perfectly consistent conclusion doesn’t work for you because you are a speciesist: you’re assuming that because animals aren’t human the same rules don’t apply. However, since you are simply basing this on a biological distinction, your justification doesn’t work any better than the racist who would cite “race” or the sexist who would cite “sex” as the relevant dissimilarity justifying dissimilar treatment.

gooblyglob:
Thanks to you I have decided to EAT MORE ANIMALS and try to USE MORE ANIMAL PRODUCTS.

Please please please go ANNOY SOMEONE ELSE.

Alex:
Do bolded and capitalized letters mean you’re yelling? Should I take your response as an indication that you don’t have a counter-argument?

gooblyglob:
I do but I’m not going to waste it on you. I have better things to do with my time eg. eat KFC

Besides, there is so much wrong with what you wrote, you must be a twisted human being to even come up with any sort of defence for vivisection.

Bolded upper case = yelling (at least you *got* that bit) = hopefully you might get the hint and GO AWAY.

Alex:
I said read carefully above, and you didn’t. If you had you’d notice that it was *you* who came up with a defense of vivisection. I merely applied your own reasoning consistently.

Very clever retort by the way: “Eat KFC.”

Listen, I understand that it’s uncomfortable to be confronted with some of your own inconsistencies. It’s easier to assume we’re correct, rather than reason toward that conclusion. But that’s not any reason to joke about suffering and death. And the suffering and death necessary to get you your KFC is unimaginable; only a monster would think that’s funny.

***********

Here’s an addition to the comment thread:

gooblyglob:

seriously, wtf is WRONG WITH YOU?

I never ever even mentioned vivisection, I think it is beyond abhorrent. Don’t put words in my mouth and then claim their my own inconsistencies.

Arguing with you is like arguing with a Christian fanatic that God doesn’t exist. It’s useless and painful like running into a brick wall. I’m not uncomfortable, I just happen to recognise a lost cause ie. you when I encounter one.

Alex:

I never claimed you mentioned vivisection. I simply applied your own reasoning consistently to justify other forms of harm. If it is helpful for you, let’s replace “vivisection” with “eating other humans” and my point still stands: As long as we give them a good life, killing humans for food is ethically acceptable. That’s your argument applied logically, gooblyglob.

This is clear throughout my comments: your argument applied in different contexts results in conclusions that you don’t like and therefore you should re-consider your assumptions. Simple and consistent.

What’s funny, is that like the god fanatics, you can’t be convinced to check your own speciesist assumptions despite speciesisms similarity to racism and sexism. Two forms of prejudice I assume you reject. Yours, it would seem, given the lack of substantive counter-arguments, is belief without evidence; the definition of faith and irrationality.