Archive for the 'Personal' Category

Foster Mom

Ever since I graduated from college, my attention span has shot right out the window. Either I’m out of the house, doing actual things that don’t involve a mouse, or I’m clicking my mouse aimlessly, trying to find something to stimulate the case of ADD that seems to have ambushed me. That and, until recently, I actually had a full time job which involved being on the computer for 8 straight hours most days, something that fails to make me inclined to spend anymore time staring at a screen than I had to.

Alas, the wonderful job is gone now, and if I didn’t keep indulging my new foster-habit, I might actually have some time to write posts. Except fostering, and volunteering for Philadelphia’s only no-kill shelter, is pretty much an all consuming thing. Especially since I seem to choose fosters who need a little extra attention and make Alex want to rip what little hair he has out of his head.

Since last October, we’ve had seven dogs come in and out of our home. Two full grown Pit mixes (one of whom is still here), two Cane Corso puppies, one Mastiff/Lab mix puppy, one Pit mix puppy, and now in addition to our full grown Pibble Kensey, two teensy, tiny puppies. How teensy tiny, you ask? Well, when we got them on Thursday, they were approximately 9 days old and weighted 6oz and 9oz, respectively. That’s tiny enough to fit in the palm of one hand. Officially, they are Boston Terrier/Chihuahua mixes, surrendered with their mom to the Philadelphia animal care and control team because their owner did not/could not provide medical care for their very sick mom. She died within an hour of being brought to their ICU, leaving the two puppies orphans who need to be bottle fed every two hours or so. Fortunately, they’re doing well, no thanks to the person who didn’t think about the potential for complications and medical care before he allowed or forced his dog to become pregnant.

Out of all the foster dogs we’ve had, it is our current adult girl whose story bothers me the most. Kensey is almost two, a petite 40lb brindle with dainty white markings and a delicate muzzle. That muzzle is the only thing that marks her as a Pit mix - her body is athletic and muscular and beautiful, and her personality is the quintessential Pit; her favorite activity is sneaking over to lay her head in your lap. She is a beautiful dog, and according to our artificial standards, a perfect one. She is housebroken, polite, well mannered on her leash, and knows a variety of commands from “sit” to “touch”. Like many adult dogs, she is slightly dog selective and does not enjoy being leaped on by the young or excited. To those dogs she gives a low warning growl, and then politely waits for a human to intervene. With dogs she likes, she is playful and happy, throwing down play bows and leaping about with a silly grin on her face. Her first friend in our home is Cassidy, the emaciated American Staffordshire mix we were watching for a friend. Cassidy was so sick and exhausted from an emergency abort-spay that all she could do was lay on the couch, and Kensey simply laid next to her for almost 24 straight hours, surprising everyone.

Sometime in her puppyhood, Kensey became a stray. I don’t know how or why, but she was lucky enough to be adopted out. Most puppies are. Before her first year of life was over, Kensey was returned to the shelter because her family was moving, and could not, or would not, take her with them. Again, she was adopted out and again, returned. And once more, in October of 2009. The shelter, as nice as it is, was stressful to her. Why was she there? Where were her family? So many people walked by her, but almost no one stopped to pay attention. So she barked, and barked. Finally, after an urgent plea was sent out on her behalf, a family took her into foster care.

And then she came back.

She was “overprotective” the family said - during a play wrestling match between father and daughter, and excited Kensey leaped up and with her overlong nails, scratched the daughter. So she was returned, again.

I had agreed to take her in December, when our other adult foster dog, Milly was adopted. However, before I could, she was gone. I took in two puppies instead and adopted them out, and then she was back. I asked for a nice, easy foster, and so she came home with us. The first weekend was smooth, too smooth. I loved her instantly, and she stuck to me like glue. Everything went well, until I left for work for the first time. Halfway down the hall I heard the resounding barks of a dog in distress, but I went anyway, hoping she’d settle down like most dogs do.

She didn’t.

The cycle of adoption and returns damaged Kensey, psychologically. She now suffers from what is commonly known as separation anxiety - in other words, when we leave the house, she panics. Although it’s impossible to know what she really thinks, one could guess at the thoughts behind her terror. This condition isn’t something she started out with, as the staff at the shelter can attest to. It is something we induced by treating her like a piece of furniture that can simply be returned when no longer convenient. No matter how many times she sees us come back, something in her still realizes that each parting could be our last. Although she clearly enjoys us, maybe even loves us, she does not trust us. She cannot trust that we will return, that our kindness is not an act of convenience. And she is right - her home here is only temporary, although she cannot know that we will be sending her away to someone who will love and cherish her.

Many times when we talk about the suffering we cause non-humans, we concentrate on the physical. Indeed, this week fellow vegan Alan Shriver actually suggested that perhaps we can somehow engineer animals to feel no pain, and that perhaps this is a better alternative to trying to actually convince the world to go vegan. And while yes, maybe we can eradicate the connections that allow us to feel physical pain, this is only a tiny portion of the suffering we cause non-humans, even when we’re not being “that bad.” Kensey has few scars from her time on the street. She has not been beaten, or used for dog fighting, or starved. Physically she is in perfect shape, unlike so many of the other dogs I see at the shelter. But the damage our actions have done to her mind, to her ability to function as an independent individual, to enjoy simple things like eating independent of our presence, that damage is so very real, and so very painful. Maybe her scars are metaphorical, but they exist just the same, and they do cause her pain.

Princess

Regan

Regan knows she owns us. Since our move from DC, she and Jax have become friends, and she transferred most of her attentions, affections and attitude over to him - something he’s not totally sure about still. On occasion, she still likes to come be social with us humans though. This is her on our bed, nosing my camera and wondering why it isn’t providing her with TREATS!

Three years in

Three years ago, towards the end of August, Alex and I made a life-altering decision six hours into an eight hour drive home from vacation. It was the start of our relationship, and has been one of the defining factors ever since. When we decided to give up dairy, eggs and other non-meat animal bi-products, I didn’t really give it much thought besides how I was going to “get through” that specific day without cheese or eggs. I thought I would be overwhelmed, both by cravings and the sheer amount of food we were no longer willing to eat. I prepared myself for the worst, but I knew I was ready. I jumped with both feet, half expecting to fail but ready to try just the same.

As it turned out, there was very little change in my life. I swapped out the yogurt and milk in my fridge for soy milk and soy yogurt, and discovered Earth Balance butter. We tried a couple new restaurants, but for the most part ate at all our old favorites. I cooked in a little more, tried some new ingredients. When pizza commercials came on TV, I changed the channel. I still craved cheese, especially when eating around omnivores, but I channeled my energy into school and my new relationship. Sometimes I would slip - a handful of chocolate chips here, a cracker with dairy in it there. I remember Alex and I taking a trip to see my grandparents in October for my 21st birthday and taking a “vegan break” which involved several slices of New York pizza and a lot of pancakes. Alex and I reasoned that Peter Singer had the right idea, and that if completely denying ourselves animal products was going to cause us to stop being vegans, then we should give ourselves a little “treat” now and again and imbibe. I gave up cheese and eggs, but I didn’t really give up wanting them. We didn’t want to be “those vegans”; too extreme, too fanatical, too strident. Some compromise, we though, is necessary to make people feel comfortable. We took the Paris Exception again, when Alex moved to DC for the first semester of his Masters program, when I visited a friend in North Carolina, and finally when Alex moved back and we went on vacation with his mom. It was a week long vacation, and we stuffed ourselves silly with “forbidden items”.

That summer, we ordered several animal rights philosophy books off the internet, among them Gary Francione’s Introduction to Animal Rights. We read them, and for the first time since I became a vegetarian at age seven, I had a true change in thinking about animals.

What brings this up is a post I read today at Vegan Feminist Agitator about the internal shift in how we conceptualize animals that seems to set vegans apart from non-vegans, in tandem with my new job - or more accurately, my new co-workers. Most of my co-workers have only recently found out I am vegan, you see, and out of the five who know, four have made the comment that they would be vegan except they “could never give up cheese”. It’s a pretty common excuse comment, I know - I made it myself, dozens of times. Even after I “gave up” cheese, I still clung to this notion that cheese (and milk and eggs and even honey) were somehow things that I had a right to. Even after “sacrificing them” I still felt like, well, I was making a sacrifice by not consuming them. They were still a treat, still an item that I felt I should somehow be able to consume. Which brings me to that summer I had my true Gestalt Shift, the summer that ended my first year of veganism.

A Gestalt Shift is essentially a true shift in intellectual position - a change in thinking so profound that it alters your whole outlook on the world, and changes the way you think. Not just the actions you take, but the way you view things. A perceptual transformation. In some ways, the transformation from omnivore to vegan in requires at least a small Gestalt Shift (after all, you must come to assign some value non-humans that you did not previously allow them), but I think that for some vegans, it isn’t all that big of a change. After all, most humans assign independent value to the non-human animals we keep as pets. It isn’t that difficult to say okay, if my dog deserves not to be killed at eaten, then a pig doesn’t either. Our rational, categorical minds can understand this, and most of us are socialized early on to believe that non-human pet animals deserve love, kindness and at least some consideration. The kind of veganism that results from the extension of this concept is the kind that says we should refrain from harming non-humans, but still allows us to have some rights to them - to their bodies, and the products of their bodies - because they still “belong” to us. This is how I felt about animals when I first went vegan. We (humans) owned them, but it was not right or acceptable to harm them if we could avoid doing so. Perhaps, one day, I would have a cow of my own to milk, and some chickens whose eggs I could eat, but until then I would avoid consuming animal products unless I felt I had to, to protect my veganism. In other words, I still had the rights to their products, as long as they weren’t harmed. And if it was in their best interest, I would consume the products.

This is probably nothing new to most people - that it takes a pretty large shift in thinking to go from it’s-not-okay-to-harm-animals-but-it-is-okay-to-treat-them-like-we-have-rights-to-them to we-have-no-right-to-own-or-use-anything-they-do-are-or-make, but it’s this concept that struck me dumb that summer, two years ago. I had my Gestalt Shift that day, and suddenly it became easy, simple, effortless to live without cheese or eggs or milk. I no longer had the desire to consume them, because suddenly, they weren’t mine to consume anymore than the flesh of a human child would be. I went from “someday, I’ll have cheese again…” to the sudden realization that I never wanted cheese again. It wasn’t that it tasted bad, or smelled bad, or looked bad  - it was just that somewhere in my head, a switch went off that changed my thought process completely. It was sudden, profound and unasked for, and once it was done there was no going back.

That shift changed a lot more than just the way I looked at cheese, and forced me to re-evaluate a lot of other things in my life, but I’ve never been more thankful for anything, ever. Unlike my original transition to veganism, my Gestalt Shift changed a lot in my life. In many ways, it was the shakeup I feared when I first switched diets. I suddenly came to understand why so many vegans acted the way they did (or I perceived they did) towards omnivores and vegetarians, and why they could be so hostile. I started to feel uncomfortable eating with still-omnivorous friends. I started talking to my non-vegan friends about why they should be vegan. It went from being a “personal choice” to something that was so clearly right for everyone that I wondered why I didn’t see it long ago. I struggled with some aspects, but for the most part I finally felt like I was doing the right things. Some things didn’t change - I still didn’t hold with PETA’s activism techniques, for example - and I was glad because it helped me to understand that this wasn’t just a fad or passing set of ideals. Somehow, I had really and truly changed my internal wiring.

Three years in, I wonder why I didn’t see the bright clear line I see now before. Like Alex, like Marla over at Vegan Feminist Agitator, I still don’t always understand why other people aren’t capable of seeing it and switching their own internal switch. I still don’t know how to get people to make that switch, and I don’t always know how to deal with people who haven’t made it, but are otherwise good people. I don’t know quite how to come to terms with most of my own family’s studied, determined ignorance. I don’t always know how to relate to people about my veganism, because I don’t know how to convey the profound change it has caused within me in a way that they can understand. I don’t even always know how to relate to other vegans who don’t share the same viewpoints. What I do know is that Marla is right - I am an ordinary person. I am not unique. I am smart, yes, but many people are smarter. I observe my ethics and try my best to act in accordance with my morals, but so do many others. I once said, “I could never give up cheese” when veganism was mentioned. Somehow, my switch got flipped from a position that said “I could never give up cheese,” and left logic and morality there, to a position that said “Cheese who?”

Greetings from Philly!

That’s right, we’re relocating (once again), this time to Philadelphia. (Someone who isn’t ME got into a PhD program here.) Other than the fact that it’s been impossible to find an apartment, so far, this seems like a promising place. If anyone has any food or hang out or volunteer suggestions (or a place to stay until August 26th!), send ‘em our way.

Continental Airlines is now my best friend for allowing us to travel with the rabbits in cabin. And the rabbits are little troopers for flying.

A suppliment to Jennie’s rescue story

See Jen’s post here.

It never ceases to amaze me the disregard that people show towards animals when push comes to shove. What is said and what is done is commonly totally incongruous; in short, the talk is talked, but there’s no walk. Well, talk is really cheap.

For the last six years, I’ve been working at summer camp for people with mental and physical disabilities. There, I’ve been taking care of the horses, training them, feeding them, and teaching the campers to ride and connect with the horses. Jennie, and another friend of ours, Anna, worked there as well, but both recently quit, and I sure don’t blame them. In the eyes of the camp director, the horses are nothing but a means to profit and are worth little to no care and only occasionally merit any form of attention. While I’ve phased out my role at the camp to only working there on the weekends, I’ve remained to keep an eye on the horses, because I simply don’t trust any one else with them.

Today, I got a phone call from one of the new employees informing me of several matters concerning the horses, and oh, just FYI, that they were planning on euthanizing one of the horses on Friday; for no other reason then he’s old and arthritic. Yes, he’s old, he’s 32. Yes, he’s arthritic. But he’s also been that way since I began working there and his condition is no different other then the fact that he’s six years older. So after I cried for a good 30 minutes after receiving this phone call, I called Jennie to see what her take on the situation was. She felt the same way I do about Charlie’s condition, and between her and Anna, there’s no one’s opinion on horses that I trust more.

Since all three of us had recently seen Charlie and knew he was in fine condition for a horse his age and absolutely did not require an untimely murder (I refuse to use the word euthanasia here because there’s nothing compassionate about the decision to have him put down unnecessarily), we decided I’d call the new employee back and find out more information. And fight this thing as hard as we could.

Upon talking to the employee again, this time while not sobbing hysterically, I learned that the vet she said had recommended euthanasia, acutally suggested it as something we may need to consider in the future for Charlie, and he did not, as I had been led to believe, required euthanasia immediately. He had simply said that because of Charlie’s age, his death would be something that we need to remind ourselves could happen at any time. He never provided information saying Charlie’s immediate euthanasia was imperative. I then also learned that the other people the new employees had examine Charlie was someone who is not qualified to make decisions for them, especially decisions of such magnitude.

It is amazing to me the callousness with which people treat animal life. The new employee said she left the final decision regarding Charlie’s fate with the camp director, who of course, decided to make an appointment for euthanasia. His regard for the horses is meager at best, and since Charlie is too old to be ridden, all the director sees in him is the financial drain and responsibility of keeping Charlie alive. Admittedly, the employee I talked to did not want Charlie to be euthanized, however, she saw no reason to fight this decision.

I then collected my thoughts and spent the next hour on the phone with either Jennie or Anna to decide what to do about Charlie. We all decided to do whatever we could to keep him alive. The choice was obvious: we’d split board for him three ways and move him out to pasture at the stables where both Anna and Jennie have their horses. I then called the camp director and explained to him I didn’t agree with his decision regarding Charlie and that I would like to take Charlie off his hands and try other forms of treatment for his arthritis to improve his quality of life. He agreed to let me take Charlie off the property. Thankfully, Anna found someone to pick Charlie up, but of course the camp director won’t cancel the euthanasia appointment until Charlie is actually off the property.

I want to make something very clear here. If Charlie genuinely needed to be humanely put out of his misery, I would accept that as what is best for him and recognize that it was time for him to go. Compassion is important in life and death, and Jennie, Anna, and I all realize this. None of us would want to keep Charlie around if it was painful and trying for him. Our desire to have him in our life is strong, but not selfish in the fact that we’d want him alive just to keep him alive and enjoy his company when he was in too much pain. We just want what’s best for him. And we all believe he’s still got a lot more life to enjoy with plenty of horse buddies out in pasture.

I’m still incredulous to the blatant disregard which was shown towards Charlie regarding his life! It sadly illustrates just how people regard animals in this world, as things that can come and go at our convenience, mere objects that we can cease to be considerate of once they become hard to take care of. I know I can’t save all the animals in the world, but I feel like Jennie, Anna, and I have made a difference in one very special horse’s life. A life that will continue to be in this world and I’m so grateful to Jennie and Anna for caring infinitely more than many others would in such a situation.